This YouTube video introduces the theory of bad leaders and toxic leadership styles :

Leadership Types and Theories: Bad and Toxic Leaders

Marcia Lynn Whicker popularised the term ‘toxic leader’ and the phrase is frequently used to describe bad leaders. But what does it actually mean? Sometimes we implicitly know that we are working for a terrible boss, but it can be hard to explain why.

Fortunately, researchers have developed various models to identify the traits of bad leaders. For example, Barbara Kellerman conducted a study in 2004 to define the characteristics of bad leaders. Kellerman identified seven traits. These are:

• Incompetent
• Rigid
• Intemperate
• Callous
• Corrupt
• Insular
• Evil

This video looks at each one in turn and for further information, follow the link to the full article:

How to Identify A Toxic Leader

This YouTube video introduces the theory and principles of Authentic Leadership:

Authentic Leadership: The Theory, Style and 4 Key Qualities

Authentic leadership is a relatively new leadership theory in the behavioural school of leadership theories. In many ways, it is largely the coming together of other leadership models. But it does put an emphasis on being true to self that differentiates it from other approaches. Bill George is the name most associated with the term after publishing his book from 2003.

For more information, follow the link to the full article:

What Does it Mean to Be An Authentic Leader?

This YouTube video introduces the theory and application of Transformational Leadership style:

Transformational Leadership (Theory and Style)

The concept of transformational leadership came from the study of charismatic leaders but this research identified that there are several key traits that set aside transformational leaders. Most importantly the transformational leader is a positive role model, they clearly articulate a vision, inspire creativity and develop individuals, raising up new leadership wherever they operate..

For more information, follow the link to the full article:

How to Grow from Transactional to Transformational Leadership

This YouTube video introduces the theory and application of the Transactional Leadership style:

Transactional Leadership: The Pros and Cons

Transactional leadership is a managerial style of leadership that relies on a basic agreement between a manager and worker. It is a carrot and stick approach that relates to Maslow’s hierarchy of needs.

For more information, follow the link to the full article:

What You Need to Know About Transactional Leadership

The Action-Centred Leadership style is a model for leaders developed by John Adair. This YouTube video introduces the theory:

John Adair’s Action-Centred Leadership Model

The action-centred leadership style is about balancing the needs of three core management responsibilities:

1. The Task — achieving the defined goal or mission

2. The Team — managing the defined group selected to achieve the task

3. The Individual — making sure that each person who makes up the team and every role is considered and supported..

For more information, follow the link to the full article:

The Action-Centred Leadership Model

This YouTube video introduces the theory and practice of Servant Leadership:

The Servant Leadership Style and Theory

The idea of servant leadership was popularized by Robert K Greenleaf in his book by the same name (1977). The phrase ‘servant leader’ is a seeming contradiction. Servants and leaders are often (mistakenly) seen as opposites. But we all serve something; the question is what and to what purpose?

For more information, follow the link to the full article:

Why Servant Leadership is So Powerful

All leaders can improve their skills. A leadership skill development framework, such as this one from Robert Katz, can help. This YouTube video introduces the model:

Robert Katz Leadership Skills Model

One of the most well-known of these skill development frameworks comes from the research of Robert Katz. He divided leadership skills into three primary domains. These were:

• Technical

• Human

• Conceptual

For more information, follow the link to the full article:

Which Leadership Skill Do You Need to Develop Most?

What Are The Different Leadership Styles?

What are the main different styles of leadership? Which leadership styles are best, and how do we know when to use each one?

No matter where you are on your leadership development journey, an understanding of leadership styles will help you. Even when you are not in a position of leadership, recognising different leadership types will help you navigate the workplace and contribute effectively.

There are various types of leadership styles, each with its own unique characteristics and impact. Understanding these styles is essential for identifying the most effective approach for different situations and individuals. In this article, we will explore several leadership styles, their key features, and examples. This knowledge will serve as a guide to help you identify what type of leader you are or aspire to be.

What is Leadership?

Leadership involves guiding and influencing others toward achieving common goals. It requires skills in communication, decision-making, and problem-solving. The way a leader exercises these skills defines their leadership style.

The Importance of Understanding Leadership Styles

Leadership styles significantly affect team dynamics and productivity. They shape the work environment and influence how employees perceive their roles and responsibilities. A leadership style that aligns with the needs of the team and organization can lead to higher morale, increased efficiency, and successful outcomes.

Impact on Team Dynamics

Different leadership styles can dramatically alter team dynamics. For example, an autocratic style might lead to a highly structured environment, whereas a democratic approach encourages open communication and collaboration. Understanding these dynamics helps leaders create a harmonious work environment.

Influence on Employee Motivation

The right leadership style can significantly boost employee motivation. Transformational leaders, for instance, can inspire their teams to exceed expectations by fostering a sense of purpose and achievement. Conversely, a mismatched style might lead to disengagement and decreased productivity.

Alignment with Organizational Goals

Aligning leadership style with organizational goals is crucial for success. A company focused on innovation might benefit from transformational leadership, while a business emphasizing efficiency might prefer transactional leadership. Understanding this alignment ensures that leadership efforts contribute effectively to strategic objectives.

Different Leadership Styles

1. Autocratic Leadership

Autocratic leadership, also known as authoritarian leadership, is characterized by individual control over decisions with little input from group members. Leaders maintain strict control and expect obedience from their team. This style of leadership is associated with leadership models such as the Great Man theory.

Characteristics of Autocratic Leadership

Centralized decision-making is a hallmark of autocratic leadership. Leaders in this style set clear expectations and provide explicit instructions to ensure compliance and order. The lack of collaboration means decisions are quick, but employee input is often limited.

Situations Where Autocratic Leadership Excels

In high-pressure environments where quick decisions are paramount, autocratic leadership can be highly effective. For instance, during a crisis where problems are critical and time is of the essence, a leader’s ability to direct swiftly can be advantageous. This style also suits scenarios where strict adherence to protocol is necessary.

Potential Drawbacks of Autocratic Leadership

While efficient, autocratic leadership can stifle creativity and lower morale if used excessively. Employees may feel undervalued and disconnected, leading to increased turnover and dissatisfaction. It’s essential for leaders to balance authority with empathy to maintain a motivated workforce.

Examples of Autocratic Leadership

Military command, in times of war, is a classic example of more autocratic leadership. For example, General Patton, the US commander in World War Two, was bold and decisive. He had strong opinions and an often abrasive manner, but he was also charismatic and achieved marked success in a highly pressurised situation.

2. Democratic Leadership

Democratic leadership, or participative leadership, involves team members in the decision-making process. This style values collaboration and ensures everyone has a voice.

Key Traits of Democratic Leaders

Democratic leaders prioritize group input and foster an inclusive environment. They hold regular meetings and encourage open dialogue to ensure that diverse perspectives are considered. While the leader makes the final decision, the process is collaborative and engaging.

Benefits of Democratic Leadership

This style can lead to increased employee satisfaction and innovation. By involving team members in decisions, leaders can tap into a wealth of ideas and foster a sense of ownership and accountability. It’s particularly effective in creative fields where diverse perspectives enhance outcomes.

Challenges of Implementing Democratic Leadership

The democratic process can sometimes be time-consuming, slowing down decision-making. It requires skillful facilitation to manage diverse opinions and ensure productive discussions. Leaders must strike a balance between inclusivity and efficiency to prevent stagnation.

Examples of Democratic Leadership

Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater, a highly successful investment management firm, employed a style of democratic leadership. In meetings, everyone is expected to critique ideas. Ray Dalio managed to harness the power of this collective input while mitigating the risk of slow decision-making through the use of core principles and technology to support business processes.

3. Transformational Leadership

Transformational leaders inspire and motivate their team to exceed their goals. They focus on creating a vision and fostering an environment of innovation and change.

Core Elements of Transformational Leadership

At its core, transformational leadership is visionary and inspiring. Leaders articulate a compelling vision and encourage personal and professional growth among team members. They focus on long-term goals and drive change through motivation and engagement.

Advantages of Transformational Leadership

This leadership style is highly effective in dynamic industries requiring constant innovation. Transformational leaders can ignite passion and creativity, pushing teams to new heights. Their focus on growth and development can lead to exceptional organizational performance and employee satisfaction.

Potential Pitfalls of Transformational Leadership

While inspiring, transformational leadership can sometimes overwhelm team members. The constant push for innovation and change may lead to burnout if not managed carefully. Leaders must be mindful of their team’s capacity and provide the necessary support to sustain long-term success.

Examples of Transformational Leadership

Transformational leadership is often more frequently found among start-ups and non-profit organisations. In these situations the leader is reliant upon a compelling vision to motivate people to action. They generally do not have traditional structures or large incentives to compel people. Church leaders and activists such as Dr Martin Luther King Jr fall into this category.

4. Transactional Leadership

Transactional leadership is based on a system of rewards and punishments. Leaders use formal authority to achieve performance goals.

Defining Features of Transactional Leadership

Transactional leaders emphasize performance and results through structured systems. Clear expectations are set, with rewards for meeting targets and penalties for falling short. This approach ensures accountability and consistency in task execution.

Effectiveness of Transactional Leadership

In structured environments with clear objectives, transactional leadership can drive efficiency and productivity. It’s particularly effective in sales-driven or operational roles where measurable outcomes are paramount. The clarity and predictability of this style can motivate employees to meet and exceed targets.

Limitations of Transactional Leadership

While effective, this style may stifle creativity and limit innovation. The focus on rewards and penalties may lead to a transactional relationship with employees, lacking deeper engagement or loyalty. Leaders should combine this approach with other styles to foster a more holistic work environment.

Examples of Transactional Leadership

Transactional leadership is common in industries such as construction, where most of the problem-solving does not need innovation. Most buildings use common techniques but involve multiple companies and contractors, so a carrot and stick approach, with contracts and payments, is an efficient way to manage most work.

5. Laissez-Faire Leadership

Laissez-faire leadership is a hands-off approach where team members have the freedom to make decisions. Leaders provide minimal guidance and allow employees to manage their tasks.

Characteristics of Laissez-Faire Leadership

Laissez-faire leaders offer minimal supervision, granting high autonomy to team members. This approach encourages self-management and innovation, relying on employees’ skills and expertise to drive outcomes. It’s best suited for highly skilled and motivated teams.

Situations Favoring Laissez-Faire Leadership

In creative or research-driven environments, laissez-faire leadership can unleash potential. By allowing freedom and flexibility, leaders can foster innovation and exploration. This style is ideal for teams with experienced professionals who thrive on independence.

Challenges of Laissez-Faire Leadership

Without adequate guidance, laissez-faire leadership can lead to a lack of direction and accountability. Teams may struggle with prioritization and coherence, impacting productivity. Leaders must ensure clear objectives and support systems are in place to mitigate these risks.

Examples of Laissez-Faire Leadership

Valve, the award-winning software development company, behind the Steam gaming platform and computer game mega-hits such as Half-Life and Portal, famously employs a laissez-faire style of leadership. The company has a flat structure where employees decide which projects they want to work on and organically create their teams.

Comparing Leadership Styles

Different leadership styles suit different scenarios. Understanding the advantages and disadvantages of each style helps leaders adopt the most effective approach.

Autocratic Leadership: Efficiency vs. Morale

Autocratic leadership is efficient but may lead to low morale if overused. Its strict approach ensures quick decisions but can alienate team members. Leaders should balance authority with empathy to maintain a motivated workforce.

Democratic Leadership: Collaboration vs. Speed

Democratic leadership fosters collaboration but can slow down decision-making. While it encourages diverse input, the process can be time-consuming. Leaders must manage discussions effectively to ensure timely and productive outcomes.

Transformational Leadership: Innovation vs. Burnout

Transformational leadership drives innovation but may overwhelm some team members. Its visionary approach inspires but requires careful management to prevent burnout. Leaders should provide support and recognize individual capacities to sustain momentum.

Transactional Leadership: Structure vs. Creativity

Transactional leadership offers clear goals but may stifle creativity. Its focus on rewards and penalties ensures accountability but can limit innovation. Leaders should integrate elements of other styles to encourage broader engagement.

Laissez-Faire Leadership: Autonomy vs. Direction

Laissez-faire leadership empowers teams but can result in a lack of direction. While it promotes independence, the absence of guidance may lead to disorganization. Leaders should establish clear objectives and offer support to maintain focus and coherence.

Leadership Development: Master the Top Leadership and Life Skills

Better lead in life and work to maximise your success. Sign up and access materials for free!

Choosing the Best Leadership Style

The best leadership style depends on various factors, including the organization’s culture, team dynamics, and the nature of the task. Here are some considerations:

Task Complexity and Leadership

Complex problems and tasks may benefit from democratic or transformational leadership. These styles encourage collaboration and innovation, essential for tackling intricate challenges. Leaders should assess the task’s nature to determine the most suitable approach.

Team Skill Level and Leadership

Highly skilled teams may thrive under laissez-faire leadership. Their expertise allows them to self-manage effectively, driving innovation and productivity. Leaders should evaluate team capabilities to provide the appropriate level of autonomy.

Urgency and Leadership

Urgent or critical situations might require autocratic leadership for quick decision-making. In high-pressure environments, decisive action can be critical. Leaders must recognize when speed is necessary and adapt their style accordingly.

Organizational Goals and Leadership Alignment

Align the leadership style with the strategic objectives of the organization. A company focused on innovation might benefit from transformational leadership, while efficiency-driven organizations might prefer transactional leadership. Understanding this alignment ensures leadership efforts contribute effectively to success.

Flexing Leadership Styles for Effective Management

Management often requires a blend of leadership styles to address different challenges. Effective managers are flexible and understand when to apply each style to maximize team performance and achieve organizational goals.

Situational Leadership in Management

Situational leadership is the ability to switch between styles as needed and can be considered a leadership style in its own right. It’s about being flexible and responsive to changing circumstances. Managers must assess the situation and adjust their approach to ensure the most effective leadership. This means a leader should be adaptive, but is not to be confused with Adaptive Leadership, which is a specific leadership style in itself.

Implementing Situational Leadership

Implementing situational leadership involves understanding team dynamics and organizational needs. Managers should be observant and open to feedback, continually refining their approach. This adaptability enhances their ability to lead effectively across various scenarios.

Example of Situational Leadership

A manager who adopts a transformational approach during a company rebrand but switches to transactional leadership to meet quarterly sales targets demonstrates adaptive leadership. This ability to pivot ensures that leadership efforts align with current priorities and challenges.

Understanding and Employing Leadership Styles

Leadership styles play a vital role in shaping an organization’s success. By understanding the various types of leadership, leaders can tailor their approach to suit their team’s needs and the organization’s goals. Whether you are a new manager or an experienced leader, embracing a versatile leadership style can enhance your effectiveness and drive positive outcomes.

Explore these styles further and consider how you might incorporate them into your leadership approach. As you grow in your role, remember that the most effective leaders are those who adapt and evolve with their teams. Understanding and applying diverse leadership styles can transform not only your leadership capabilities but also the overall success of your organization.

There are many other styles of leadership, each type being more applicable to different situations and leadership roles. If you would like support in exploring the right leadership style for you and your organisation, please drop me a line via the Contact Page.

Leadership Theories: The Great Man

Was I a great man? I certainly wanted to be. But then I heard the crack as my collarbone gave way. Surely this should not happen to a superhero. Where had I gone wrong?

Scroll back 30 seconds.

Do you ever dream of being a Superhero?

My cape billowed behind me. This was mainly because my Superman suit was too big and there was a draft in the hall. But the steely look on my face, that was 100% genuine.

The family was watching television, but not me.  I laughed at their weakness. Mortals! They would watch greatness on the screen, but I would achieve greatness, right here in the hallway of our home.

This was no time for sitting around, I had committed myself to the rigours of disciplined training.  I knew that if I was going to make an impact on the world – especially aged 6 – I needed to stand out.  But I had to admit, learning to fly was hard.

I had a method.  In the hall was a big antique chair with strong arms and a soft leather seat.  From the arms I could launch myself to the stairs.  Then I could turn on the stairs and leap back to the safety of the leather cushion.  All I needed to do was inch the chair further away from the stairs after each successful flight. At some point, surely, I would be released from the habit of falling to earth.

Back and forth I went, time and again.  My confidence rose. I felt the superpowers burgeoning within me; indisputably all they needed was some great need, a challenge, a crisis for them to burst forth.

Cometh the hour, cometh the Great Man?

I moved the chair a whole foot away from the stairs and mounted the launch platform once again.  I surveyed the distant stairs in my steely gaze and set my sights upon the third step.  My expression hardened, mouth set, and teeth clenched. My muscles bunched in anticipation as I crouched and, with an incredible force, leapt into the void.

I felt the blood (or was that superpower?) rushing through my veins as I flew, body outstretched.  I could feel the air rushing past my cheek; had I reached escape velocity?

The horizon started to fall away.  My speed was ebbing.  The steps seemed so distant. My confident gaze was replaced by wide-eyed panic. My lofty dreams were about to crash into the unforgiving floor of reality.

Above the sound of the television there was a large thump followed by a high-pitched yowl.  The rest of the family burst through the door and into the hall to gape at the terrible sight of the fallen hero.  There I lay; a diminutive blue and red heap at the base of the stairs, one arm held at an unexpected angle.

Hot tears of frustration and humiliation burnt my (noble) cheeks.  To maintain my dignity and protect my battered pride I removed my hero cape for the journey to hospital.

Great Man Theory

Why did I so badly want to be a superhero? Given the deluge of superhero movies it seems I am not alone in this desire.

It seems that deep down we have a yearning for power. A desire for the power to save. We also seem to want a hero to follow; someone we can respect so much we would be happy if they saved us.

This concept echoes through popular culture but is nothing new. One of the earliest official leadership theories is the ‘Great Man’ theory, as described by Thomas Carlyle. According to the hypothesis, The Great Man appears at a key moment of history to lead. Such men rise so far above ordinary people they are effectively worshipped.

“The Great Man was always as lightning out of Heaven; the rest of men waited for him like fuel, and then they too would flame.” 

Thomas Carlyle

Many of us dream of being heroes but very few of us can relate to this very narrow view of leadership as it excludes pretty much everyone. For starters is completely discounts great women and assumes people are born to greatness and leadership.

This theory leaves us with examples such as Alexander the Great, Julius Caesar or Napoleon. These are leaders who had great power and influenced history but whose methods and legacy are often highly divisive.

I have certainly never considered myself anything close to being a ‘Great Man’ and don’t feel like I was a born leader. Not only do I not have superpowers, I am also an introvert by nature, which is contrary to the traditional popular picture of a leader.

What can we learn from the Great Man model of leadership?

Carlyle was a historian trying to suggest a grand narrative of history. He was not a leadership guru but someone who viewed events through the biography of powerful men. Studying the larger-than-life figures of history, warts and all, can help us grow as leaders.

The negative illustrations of history are perhaps the most instructive. Hitler, Stalin and other despots believed they were in the mould of the ‘Great Man’, but power is not greatness. If there is one thing we have learned from superhero culture, is it that:

“With great power comes great responsibility.”

Stan Lee

God bless Stan Lee.

What makes us great?

Responsibility is using our influence for good, and good decisions are dependent upon good values.

Moral ambiguity, particularly at the beginning of the twentieth century, allowed a lot of interpretation of ‘greatness’. This ambiguity can be traced back to philosophical trends of thinkers such as Nietzsche, an incredible thinker, but one who emphasised the power of the ‘great man’ as one unbound to any external code of ethics. (Hassan 2016). Nietzsche put it this way:

“You have your way. I have my way. As for the right way, the correct way, and the only way, it does not exist.” 

Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche

And thus, the post-modern world was born.

The journey to greatness?

You would have thought that the busted collarbone would have taught me the foolishness of trying to be a superhero. In the short term it just changed my superhero aspirations from Superman to Batman. Since then, I have tallied up another snapped collarbone, a cracked arm, a couple of fractured ribs, several broken fingers and a leg in plaster.

I was not born to greatness and most of the time I do not feel like anything special. I take comfort in the words of Confucius:

“Our greatest glory is not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall.”

Confucius

So even if you don’t feel like the superhero, the great man or the leader, don’t give up. Being a leader, being a great person, is less about power than it is about taking responsibility and having a growth mindset.

That is how we fly above the lesser version of ourselves.

If you want some help in making yourself a better person and leader, check out our free online courses by clicking on the link below.

Leadership Development: Master the Top Leadership and Life Skills

Better lead in life and work to maximise your success. Sign up and access materials for free!

---

References

Carlyle, Thomas (1840) On Heroes, Hero Worship, and the Heroic in History,

Hassan, Patrick (2016) Nietzsche on Human Greatness, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10790-016-9570-9

Lee, Stan (2002) The Amazing Spider-Man, Vol. 2 #38, New York: Marvel Worldwide Inc.

Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm (1885) Thus Spake Zarathustra,

What is Situational Leadership?

In this series on leadership theories, we have already looked at early ideas such as the Great Man theory, Control and Domination and Leadership Traits. As research into leadership developed, studying leadership skills led to looking at the behaviours (behavioural leadership) and actions of leaders. (Action-Centred Leadership).

It was now recognised that leadership can take different forms. Therefore, studies were made into which situations certain leaders thrived in. This led to various theories of situational leadership.

Who Developed Situational Leadership Theory?

For example, Fiedler (1967), argued that there was no one right way to lead, but rather that the type of leader and style of leadership needed to suit the situation. Sometime later on, Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard (author of The One Minute Manager) developed a model situational leadership that many people will be familiar with.

Blanchard and Hersey’s Situational Leadership Model

This model helps to show the most appropriate form of leadership, depending upon the nature of the task and the competency and commitment of the team. In simple terms it breaks down into four key leadership approaches:

• Directive – telling people what to do, usually used for enthusiastic novices
• Delegating – giving over whole tasks to people who are experienced and able to take responsibility. This is a more hands-off leadership approach
• Supporting – this is when there is a high level of trust in the team and individuals can manage themselves independently. But the leader has higher participation than in pure delegation, by providing moral support, encouraging and communicating proactively
• Coaching – this involves selling the task to the individual and helping them grow to take on more responsibility. This works particularly well with individuals who may have lost confidence in what they need to do

The following diagram summarises the Blanchard model:

Ken Blanchard’s Situational Leadership Model

Team Member Development and Maturity Levels

As well as the four leadership styles in the model there are also four development levels that relate to the maturity and capability of the team members. In the model these progress from D1, at the low end of maturity and development, to D4, where the person is highly capable to deal with the task.

It is important to remember that someone could be very experienced generally but, faced with a new task, they could find themselves out of their depth. Therefore, as a manager, it is important to think about someone’s ability to do the specific task and how to lead them in that situation rather than just the usual default approach.

For example, I have worked with CEOs who are incredibly experienced and gifted but who have required coaching support as their roles and organisations have evolved. It is an important lesson in humility for all leaders as well as team members. It does not matter how capable we are (or think we are), there will always be times where we are learners and need people to support us.

Situational Leadership Examples

I have found this situational leadership model useful in helping to understand how I can adapt my leadership style, depending on the situation. It has also assisted me in identifying my preferred approaches.

Delegating and Supporting

It has been my privilege to work with and lead some really experienced and capable teams. Therefore, a much as possible, I like to adopt a more non-directive leadership approach. I also like to be led this way and generally be left to get on with things (S4). Because I tend towards being a hands-off leader, I have learned to communicate this to teams early. I let them know that they can ask questions and, if necessary, demand more support from me (S3).

Coaching

When I see an individual who needs help, I trend towards a coaching style (S2). I really enjoy going with people on their learning journey. Seeing people confident and empowered is hugely motivating for me and that is a big reason why I actively coach leaders alongside my other leadership responsibilities.

Directing and Commanding

I keep the more directive approach (S1) for times of real crisis. Generally, I don’t tend to stay in this mode for long. My children might argue and say, “Daddy, you are always ordering me around!” But, in my defence, I would argue that if you visited our house around bedtime, it is a crisis zone!

I have used this command style of leadership at times in the military, which might be an obvious example. But it has also been critical to other situations. I have used this style when leading teams off mountains in bad weather and when reacting quickly to bad news in a business context. This directive style can be a reassuring approach in a crisis. However, it quickly becomes overbearing if used all the time, particular with an able team.

To be a Leader is to be a Learner

No matter where we are on our journey we can all discover something new about leadership. It does not even matter how much responsibility we have (or don’t have). Everyone can learn to lead better and flex their leadership style for different situations. The best leaders are not stuck in one mode of management all the time.

So think about your team and their tasks today. As a manager, do you need to direct, delegate, support or coach them through their next piece of work?